Gotta Move ASAP

They gotta move. Gotta do it quick. ASAP.  They are in fear.

Seriously, this is utter bullshit.

It’s followed by the predictable comments:  “We are praying for your lovely family.”  “This is terrible.”  “Why do such awful people keep doing all these awful things to you?”

But you see, Nicole just says “the level of attack continues to escalate.”

What?

The sentence carries with it the idea that the “attacks” have been ongoing, and constantly getting worse.

She offers no examples or proof of anything at all. The one real biggy she tried to foist off on people was the Blessed Little Excursion.

Nothing happened that night, except that Joe drank a beer while standing in the road, impeding traffic.  But that’s supposedly an “attack.”

For the record, I was in Breckinridge County on Monday, for much of the day.  I was at Al Wilson’s house.  He and I and Dave and Al’s wife cut up a huge hog and two large lambs. Four people, working as hard as we could go. Then we had dinner and some nice conversation.

Dave and I left before dark, mostly because we had to get home to milk Frances.

The subject of the Naugler family barely was mentioned. Nobody went to their nearby property and “attacked” them.

The comments also included the usual “why don’t you call the police” and the usual “we do and the police won’t do anything.”

Someone suggests guard dogs, not understanding that the Nauglers go through dogs the way my cow goes through hay.

haveyour6

So the issue here is the land.  It’s not the business. They don’t want to move out of the area, just off the land to some other land, because they are in danger.

Her brain-dead followers just go ape shit without knowing the first thing.

I asked Al to explain to me what “have your 6” means.  He said that it’s an aviation term, referring to the 6:00 position on a clock-face. This is the place where the pilot can’t see, so if you “have his 6” you’re telling him that you’re watching his back.

But then somebody asks an obvious question: “Do you think these people will follow you?”

She has no idea who “these people” might be, but it would seem that if somebody is threatening you to the point that you think you have to flee, questioning whether the would-be assailant would follow is a reasonable thing to ask.

willfollow

Nicole totally ignores the “will they follow you” stuff until somebody brings up social media. Then she makes it clear that no way is she leaving social media.

Let’s understand this.

She is so afraid of these nameless “attackers” that she is willing to move. They have a land contract. Leaving would mean that they would simply forfeit every payment they have made. They would have to pay somebody to haul their two garden sheds to a new location and set them up.  She is terrified, and has to do this “ASAP” because the level of these “attacks” is “escalating.”

Yet she makes it clear that she’s going to go right on posting anything and everything about her entire family, her children’s names, faces, detailed information about their likes and dislikes, information about everything you can think of, including Joe posting shit about sex.  And she’s fully aware that this means that the supposed “attackers” will simply “follow,” but they will do their best.

Will do their best to what?

In Syria, there are now and have been people fleeing for their lives from Aleppo. This is not a joke. It’s a massacre and has been happening for several years.  The level of attacks is truly and for real escalating.  And some of those folks have been on social media documenting the events. But do you suppose for a single second that if they could escape, and if they thought that the Syrian army would follow them and subject them to the same horror they currently are living through, that they would just continue to post on social media?

It’s this comment, this one comment, that tells me that nothing at all has happened, that this is Nicole making shit up about “attackers.”  I have  a couple of personal theories about why she does this, but it has nothing to do with “attackers.”

animalschildren

And here’s the second one. If you are in fear, you simply get rid of the animals. Obviously, she isn’t going to ditch the kids, but nobody is forcing her to take a horse she can’t even afford to feed.

shameshoot

trash

Jenna, you dumbass, she already “dropped” a whole pile of names. She’s done it repeatedly. She “dropped” my address as well, and invited people to visit. Nobody took her up on it.

But notice how quick Jenna is to call unknown people “trash” and then follow it up with “prayers”?  Fuck you, Jenna, and your “prayers.”

directneighbor

Beth, I hate to be the one to break it to you, but Nicole is not “far from stupid.”  She is actually quite close to it.  In fact, I think she sleeps with it every night.

But now we’re getting someplace.  It’s the “direct neighbors” that she is talking about. The evil, dangerous “direct neighbors.”

Seriously?

Beth says, “We all know the lengths these people will go to.”

We do?  What lengths?  Exactly what?  Riding down the fucking road?  Making some commentary on the internet?  Reporting them for dumping shit on the ground?  Reporting them because they allowed their livestock to run loose all over the damned place and refused to contain them even after they’d been asked to do so?

Oh, yeah, I forgot. “Vehicular assault.”  The assault that didn’t happen.

Do the Naugler neighbors want the Nauglers to move?

I haven’t really interviewed all of them to ask that question, but my guess is yes, they do.  I know I would if I were them. As far as I can tell, every single person who has ever lived in arm’s reach of the Nauglers was glad to see them move.   That doesn’t translate into wishing the Nauglers harm, or doing anything to “attack” them.  It just means that the Nauglers are not well-liked.

I cannot imagine why that is.

leavework

And what would that be, Michelle? All they have worked for?  They have done almost nothing. There are no permanent structures on that property.  There have been zero improvements made to the land.  In fact, they have polluted the land with human waste.

sniper

I don’t even believe this for a second.

However:

good shot

She was referring there to her youngest daughter.

pullpocket

And here we finally get the “escalation” event.

Somebody stopped in front of their property, got out of his truck and pulled “something” from his pocket.

His phone?  A candy bar?  A hand grenade? A love letter?

Who the hell knows?

This, though, is threatening and an attempt to “set us up.”  Remember, this is a woman who turned a small fender-bender (that didn’t even bend the fender) into “vehicular assault.”  If I’d been the person in the truck, I’d have gotten in my vehicle and left immediately as well.

Nicole then further attempts to prove that the “level of attacks” is “escalating” by posting a screen shot of a status from one of the critic sites, the Great and Stupid Show or whatever it’s called.

That was a public status.

Nicole calls it a “kryptic message.”  [Nicole, the word is “cryptic.”  #unschooling ]  She’s trying to make it appear like a private message, but it was completely public.

scarycrypticmessage

This whole thing is ridiculous.  Nicole knows it’s ridiculous. Nobody has threatened them, ever.  They don’t get along well with their neighbors, but that’s not new. They have never gotten along well with any neighbors.

This is not about neighbors or threats or fear.

This is more than likely about not paying the land payment and facing eviction.

Or it’s about it’s damned cold today and will be again tonight and that garden shed is miserable and maybe they are living in the salon and want to have “documented” an excuse for that.

Frankly, I think their neighbors have been more patient than they should have been.  If the Nauglers lived next-door to me, I would have security cameras posted all along the property line, along with a stout fence. I would be recording 24/7.  And I would have shot the goats (and I don’t even own a gun, so I would have had to borrow one.)  I’d have a lawyer on speed-dial.

 

 

 

 

 

Threats and Bluffs

threats BLH

“They” send Nicole “send money because I’m afraid” Naugler threats.  Facebook is fine with that.  She posts screenshots of those threats and Facebook takes them down.

Well, I wanna see the threats.  I am inviting you to send me copies of those screen shots that Facebook took down, the ones threatening you. Send them to me and I will post every last one of them right here for all the world to see.  You’ll get a big audience.

I call your bluff, Nicole.

Are these examples?

Oh, wait. No. Those are threats made to me, not you.  And they were made by you, Nicole, or by your surrogates.

legal threat 2Nicole commentpoop mebetween the eyesgood shotThe blocked name is that of her minor daughter.

punch

Should I go on?  I can, you know.  I could fill this whole page and another two or three if I wanted to spend some time at it. Here’s a few others.

But then there is this.

Nathan 1

Nathan 2

Apart from the egregious errors of fact involved here, this is outrageous.

I will make one threat, Nicole “I am documenting everything” Naugler. I never, ever forget shit like this.  Ever. And I never, ever forgive it.

Document that.

 

Criteria

Funny how free speech is a big deal to Nicole as long as we’re talking about her right to free speech.  Free speech does not apply to anyone else, ever.  All speech about her must pass her criteria to be permitted.

Those rules do not apply here.

This blog exists off Facebook for that reason. I knew this going in.  I knew that if criticism of the Nauglers remained on Facebook, it would be subject to Joe and Nicole and their leghumpers petitioning Facebook to take down pages and comments and photos endlessly.

She cannot do that here. She can complain if she wants. She can figure out who runs the hosting service and complain to them. I will tell you what they will tell her: “Suck it up, buttercup. First Amendment.”

batshit crazy

Oh, my word. Nicole is all upset.  Somebody “alerted” her to a comment. No they didn’t. Nicole reads every word written here. She probably checks this blog four times a day.

But no matter, she’s upset.  It’s a “credible threat of violence online.”

Here it is.

farm girl

Note what she says.  She will go with “protection in hand.”  Then she qualifies that.  It will be “legal protection” and it “does not require a permit or purchase of anything to go with it.”

Dunno about you, but that eliminates anything violent. “Protection” doesn’t necessarily mean from violence.  I know Nicole jumps on stuff and pretends it does but it doesn’t.  Farm Girl might well have meant she would bring her lawyer or her boyfriend or some other witness. I know I would.

And then she explains why she would go. She would go to “prove a point that she thinks she knows all the trolls when she does not really know them much at all.”

Not she would go “to beat Nicole into a bloody pulp.”

That would be a “credible threat of violence online.”

This is not.

That’s why I allowed it.

I want to talk about my criteria here because Nicole, since she has no idea who Farm Girl is, has decided this is all my fault. She makes a big deal out of the fact that I allowed this comment and that I will not remove it.

I try very hard to keep things on an even keel here. The rules of Facebook do not apply. The rules of Sally Davis apply.

Those rules are fairly simple because I am a very big advocate of the First Amendment.  You know how people are just rabid about the Second Amendment?  Well, I’m like that about the first one.

First Rule: For the most part, the kids are off-limits. We cannot pretend there are no children, and I’m not going to pretend that Nicole doesn’t pimp them out for donations because she does. But I will not identify any of them, won’t show their faces, and will not use their names. I also do not like to speculate about their futures very much. Edited to add: Minor children are off-limits.

Second Rule: For the most part, the business is off-limits. Again, I cannot pretend there is no business, but I don’t want to discuss it here. I don’t want to have anything here that could be construed as somehow thwarting Nicole’s sincere efforts to earn an honest living. I rather applaud that, frankly. Sometimes the line there is fuzzy, but I try.

Third Rule: I expect those of you commenting to behave like adults. There are a few of the critics that in my opinion are as crazy as Nicole and her followers. If those were the only critics, I would be happy to let all of them (Joe, Nicole, Charles, the other leghumpers and the crazy critics) battle it out without me.

I try to force them to tone it down here. I know they let it all go on Facebook, but I really do monitor what is said here. And everyone here knows that from time to time, I put my foot down.  I would also ask everyone to think about what they write and consider whether their comment will help or hurt the situation.  If you go off all half-cocked with silly nonsense and unsubstantiated assertions, you just give Nicole fodder that she can use to raise the ire of her brain-dead followers so she can get their money. That’s what she’s after, so don’t give her a gift.

I walk a fine line between my own ideas about what is appropriate and what other people think is appropriate.  If I wanted to keep it all perfect and untainted with outside influences and ideas, I would simply disallow all comments, period, and only my opinions would be read here.

But again, I love, love, love the First Amendment, so I tend to err on the side of being lenient in moderation. So Farm Girl’s comment was approved and remains approved. I would not have said it.  I wouldn’t do it (show up unannounced), but I’m not Farm Girl.

And I would add that the person who is walking close to making a violent threat online is Nicole with her last sentence.

*note: in Kentucky it’s legal to conceal carry without a permit on ones own property. This includes ones business.

She is saying that if you come on her property and she doesn’t like your behavior, she might shoot you. You should be aware that she’s capable of doing it and has the means to do so.

That’s why my invitation to her is for lunch at some public place. And such a lunch date would not be announced on Facebook or on this blog. Unlike Nicole, I don’t even own a gun.